LOTHIAN SAFE ROUTES

A SPOKES, The Lothian Cycle Campaign, Project
 

 

March 24th David Hume Tower

Presentation by Jo Cleary (OHPs)

(Later report based on findings)

  • Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Summary of schools involved

Number of schools that responded: 140


Number of pupils involved: 45007

(range of school size 30 – 1300)


Types of schools involved:

Primary (including nursery, infant, etc) 77%

R. C. primary 6%

High 11%

Special 6%


Location of schools involved:

Rural/village 19%

Small town 29%

Large town 9%

City centre 13%

City suburb 30%


Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Distance travelled to school



Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Traffic problem associated with the school?

No problem 17%


A slight problem 19%


A moderate problem 22%


A significant problem 26%


A very serious problem 16%


Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

School's position on pupils walking

School discourages pupils for safety reasons 2%


School would like to encourage pupils to walk 15%


The school has no particular policy on walking 60%


The school activity encourages walking 23%

School's position on pupils cycling

School does not allow pupils to cycle 35%


School would like to encourage pupils to cycle 23%


The school has no particular policy on cycling 33%


The school activity encourages cycling 9%


Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Does the school actively promote walking

(e.g. 'Walk to school weeks')?




Yes 18% No 82%

 

If no, would it like to?



Yes 80% No 20%


Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Provision of school cycle parking facilities

Some provision 23%


No provision 77%

Provision of cycle training at school

Some provided 50%


None provided 50%

If none, would school like to provide it?

 

Yes 89% No 11%

 

Numbers trained last year

Total: 1587 (range 4 – 90 pupils)

Year groups trained:

P6 (38%), P7 (55%), S1 (5%), S3 (2%)


Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Relative importance of measures to

facilitate walking to school





Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Relative importance of measures to

facilitate cycling to school



Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

School activities to encourage walking and cycling

Education of pupils

Lesson time devoted to raising awareness about:

road safety

sustainable transport

health issues

the environment

Special assemblies

Questionnaire surveys/traffic counts by pupils, and classroom displays of results

Theatre company presentations/workshops

RSOs invited into schools on regular basis

Themed road safety projects, e.g. conspicuity during winter months

'Traffic Trails'

Poster displays by pupils at school, local libraries, public buildings

'Be safe, be seen' fashion show

'Healthy living' weeks



Education involving parents

Themed school newsletters and leaflets

Discussion on SRTS at:

School Board meetings

PTA meetings

Parents' evenings

School-based SRTS working party

School policy statements on promoting walking and cycling

SRTS promotional events/days/weeks/projects involving variety of interested parties


Road safety

Appointment of Junior Road Safety Officers (JRSOs) from among pupils

SRTS competitions, organised by JRSOs, e.g.:

road safety quizzes

logo design

SRTS notice boards, maintained by JRSOs


Walking measures

Older pupils supervising younger pupils walking to school

Walking school bus

Walk to school weeks


Cycling measures

Cycle to school weeks

Cycle proficiency training, and 'refresher' courses

Requests to local authorities for school cycle parking facilities

Provision of secure cycle parking facilities at school

CCTV surveillance of cycle parking area

Cycle helmet promotion discount schemes for pupils

Bike maintenance workshops

Cycle events, e.g. off-road mountain biking


Measures involving local authorities and other bodies

Involvement in SRTS pilot projects run by local councils, pressure groups, etc

Risk assessment of school by local highway authority

Fencing and gates to improve segregation of NMUs and motor traffic

Improvements to NMU school routes following requests to local authorities

'Twenty's plenty' campaign

Liaison with local police, road safety officers, local transport authority officers, etc


Parking measures

Police patrols at school arrival/departure times

Requests to parents to park away from school accesses

Pupils issuing leaflets to parents parking thoughtlessly

Pupils writing directly to parents

'No parking' banners produced by pupils and displayed outside the school

Photograph dangerous/inconsiderate parking, and 'shame' offenders

Allocation of sports pitches for school parking (!)

Staggered parent arrival/departure times



Other measures

Advice/education on using school/public buses

Mapping of SRTS and problem sites by pupils

Pupils/parents helped to identify safest walking and cycling routes for school journeys, and encouraged to use them

Development of SRTS 'rules' and 'codes of conduct'

SRTS recommendations check lists for school and other bodies


Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Measures identified by head teachers to further

assist SRTS initiatives

Traffic speeds

Lower speed limits in the vicinity of schools

Enforce appropriate speed limits near schools

Erect speed cameras on school routes schools



Crossing facilities

Better/more crossing facilities:

school crossing patrols (lollipop personnel)

zebra crossings

pelican crossings

toucan crossings

pedestrian refuges

Re-site existing school crossing patrols

Improve conditions for school crossing patrols (pay, status, etc)





Traffic management

Divert all but essential motor traffic away from schools

'Access only' for motor traffic in the vicinity of schools

Traffic calming

Traffic management measures in vicinity of school – e.g. road closures



Parking restrictions

Enforcement of parking restrictions near the school

Introduce new/more parking restrictions: zig-zag lines, yellow lines, hatching, etc

Prevent parents parking in/near school grounds

Reorganise/allocate parent drop-off and pick-up areas

Police presence to enforce parking/speeding/other traffic offence

Traffic wardens to enforce parking restrictions near schools

Develop parking agreements with school neighbours

Enforce no parking restrictions on footways and cycle lanes





Special consideration for NMUs

Separate school accesses for motor vehicles and NMUs (pedestrians and cyclists)

Safeguard NMU routes to schools in new development proposals

Risk assessment of pupils' travel patterns by local authorities

Give greater priority to pedestrians and cyclists in the vicinity of schools


Walking measures

Improve lighting on school walking/cycling routes

Provide more continuous footways

Widen existing footways

Erect barriers between footways and busy roads

Walking school buses/adult supervision of young pedestrians



Cycling measures

Remedy/avoid cycle-unfriendly traffic calming measures

More-better cycle facilities on school routes

Secure, weather-proof school cycle parking




Other measures

Implement measures/ideas identified through SRTS projects, in collaboration with other interested parties

Allay parental fears about stranger danger

Permit for those driving to school – limited to those with strong case/reasons

Ensure school transport operators follow safety guidelines

Define school (mini-)bus parking/waiting/turning areas

'Move the school to a quieter location' (!)

Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Current means of school travel (P6/7-S1/2)



Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Preferred means of school travel (P6/7-S1/2)



Lothian Safe Routes Project: survey results

Comparison of current and preferred means

of school travel (P6/7-S1/2)


 

Site produced by
Chris Hill, ch.edinburgh
35 Bruntsfield Gardens Edinburgh EH10 4DY 0131 229 0072