Additions
and Updates to this site
SPOKESWORKER 23rd. July 1998
Spokesworker is an occasional ("roughly
monthly") news sheet, with stop-press news of forthcoming events, and of
road, traffic and planning matters. It is not automatically sent to all
members. A copy is enclosed if we are writing to you anyway, and copies
are handed out at meetings of working groups. It is also published here
on the website. Also, you can make sure of getting a copy by sending Spokes
10 or so stamped addressed envelopes.
THE TRANSPORT WHITE PAPERS
The Scottish and UK Transport White Papers are now out, and do represent
a huge shift in attitudes and policies. There are also disappointments,
especially in the Scottish one. Links to both are
given below, or you can buy paper copies from the Stationery Office in
Lothian Road. The Scottish one costs approx £10, and the UK one approx
£16 [sorry exact prices not to hand just now]. Please note that
the thoughts below are based on an early reading of the document.
Good points:
-
Positively, the government has agreed that money raised from motorists
in charges will be spent directly on transport, and will not go into general
Treasury funds. This apparently is something the Treasury would normally
be totally opposed to, and is a remarkable achievement by Transport Minister
John Prescott. Charges - road tolls and/or taxation of workplace car parking
- first need legislation, so it is important to press for this legislation
as soon as possible. The charges will bring huge new sums for public transport,
cycling and walking.
-
In the Scottish Paper, a very positive aspect is that all councils are
now advised to draw up an integrated sustainable Local Transport Strategy
- including their responsibilities [PTO] under the Traffic Reduction Act.
If they do not draw up such a plan they will not be eligible for money
from a new £90million Public Transport Fund for council initiatives.
We believe this fund will cover cycling/walking projects too, despite its
name, but have still to confirm this.
There are many other good points, but we list the problems - so you
can write about them to MPs, etc!
Bad points:
-
The Scottish paper says cycling is "a vital mode in reducing
car use", and has many other very positive words. However, the main
cycling section has not a single new initiative, and no new funds allocated.
Previous talk of a new 'Cycle Challenge' scheme has even been omitted.
Admittedly, there are cycle aspects mentioned elsewhere, and we hope
the £90m councils fund above will be applicable for cycle projects,
but the main cycling section is a big disappointment.
-
The Scottish paper gives mixed messages about new trunk-road building,
and depending on how you interpret it, there is scope for big spending
to start again. Separately issued figures show the trunk road budget as
1997:£170m, 1998:155m 1999:162m, 2000:175m, 2001:186m. The 97-98
decline is the road building moratorium when Labour was elected, but there
is then a nearly £60m total increase over the next 3 years. Since
£70-£100m p.a. is needed for trunk road operation and maintenance,
that could mean perhaps £250-£270m for new trunk roads over
1999-2001; plus any roads built with private money (PFI, shadow
tolling, etc - see Spokes 69)!!!
That dwarfs the new £90m Public Transport fund above.
-
The much-heralded tax on superstores for car-park spaces has not
appeared in either White Paper. This is a real disappointment - it could
both raise money for sustainable transport, and do much to encourage superstore
green shopping plans, home delivery, bike routes, etc, and help reverse
the trend to out-of-town shopping. It is very important still to lobby
MPs on this, as it could be changed. The new laws required to bring in
road tolling and workplace carpark charging could also be made to include
this power. Note too that the laws are to allow experiments in tolling/charging,
and it would be crazy not also to include powers for experiments in charging
for superstore spaces at the same time.
-
There are no national targets for traffic reduction in either paper.
Indeed both papers talk of reducing the rate of growth of motor
traffic - but that means continued actual growth!
-
It is planned to allow councils to experiment with motorcycles in bus
lanes (not cycle lanes).
-
The Scottish Paper keeps trunk road and public transport budgets and operation
far more separate than is healthy. There is talk of integrated transport
but budgets etc don't seem to reflect this. New trunk roads will not always
be assessed on a corridor basis (i.e. in comparison with public transport
and planning initiatives), but only where appropriate.
In conclusion, do not think the disappointments above mean everything
is bad. Overall the two White Papers do mark a very significant shift
in attitudes and policies. The reason for concentrating on the bad bits
is so you can write to your MP about those that concern you - ask them
to raise these matters with the relevant minister, and let you know the
result. Please send us useful replies. Remember it's helpful
to say a few positive things at the start of your letter before you go
on to what changes you want to see!
Link to Government's Transport White Paper for Scotland
can be found at:
http://www.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm40/4010/tc-hm.htm
Government's Transport White Paper (England & Wales) can be found
at: http://www.detr.gov.uk/itwp/paper/index.htm
Press release for issue of White Paper at: http://www.coi.gov.uk/coi/depts/GTE/coi4126e.ok
SPOKES,
St. Martin's Church, 232 Dalry Road, Edinburgh EH11 2JG
Tel: 0131 313 2114 (a/phone only) or e-mail to spokes@spokes.org.uk