October 2015

Cycling cash 15/16 highest ever (just!)

Scottish Transport Minister Derek Mackay MSP has announced an additional £3.3m for active travel (mainly infrastructure) this financial year, bringing the total to nearly £40m, roughly 1.9% of total transport spending.

Speaking at the 14 October Active Travel summit this fulfills his promise first made at PoP2015 [Spokes 122, page 6], and repeated many times since, that funding would exceed the 14/15 record.  After many years hovering just under 1% of transport spending, we have now had two years doubled to just under 2%.  [Why did funding rise substantially in 14/15? – see Spokes 119, page 7].

The cash will mainly be distributed via Sustrans Community Links, under which Councils and certain other bodies can bid for 50/50 match funding for cycling infrastructure.   Being announced so late in the financial year, the cash has to be spent within just 6 months, so we suspect it is likely to mainly go to existing bids sitting in Sustrans’s ‘waiting list.’

Despite the increase, the 15/16 total of under £40m, less than 2% of transport spending, is still way below European levels or what would give any hope of meeting the government’s ambition for 10% of all trips to be by bike in 2020.  The latest Scottish Household Survey suggests that the % of all trips made by bike rose a little in 2014 to 1.4% which, astonishingly, is the highest figure for many years – still rather a long way to go!!

Future Funding Uncertainty

Cycling investment in future years is currently a complete unknown.  It may rise, fall or stay static.  To the dismay of Council cycling officers, and bodies like Sustrans – who have to plan ahead for cycle projects and for the deployment and employment of staff for cycling – the Scottish Budget for 16/17 is unlikely to be passed until a very few weeks before the 16/17 financial year begins.   And even when it is passed, we fear that the amount for cycling projects will still be unclear, as the ‘umbrella’ headings in the budget like Future Transport Fund and Sustainable and Active Travel look set to remain, with the amount for Cycling or Active Travel within these headings not being announced till much later.   Our reasoning is explained in this article.

Segregated onroad exemplar award

In addition to the £3.3m, the Minister also announced at the Active Travel Summit…

  • He has held a cross-portfolio meeting with Ministers responsible for Education, Environment, Local Government and Health, to discuss working together to boost walking and cycling.  First project will be developing new policies to tackle the car-based school run.

Disappointing Summit attendance – but RTPs engage

This was the first Ministerial ‘Active Travel Summit’  following two years of ‘Cycling Summits’  hosted by previous Scottish Transport Minister Keith Brown MSP.   The idea of the summits is to bring together top transport decision makers from Councils, to enable high level discussion with the Minister.

Unfortunately, unlike the previous cycling summits, attendance was disappointing, with fewer councils and fewer top people.  The reasons are unclear.

Scottish Councils attending

  • Aberdeenshire
  • Ayrshire (Roads Alliance of East and South Ayrshire)
  • North Ayrshire
  • East Dunbarton
  • Edinburgh
  • Falkirk
  • Fife
  • Glasgow
  • Highland
  • Moray
  • Orkney
  • Perth & Kinross

Regional Transport Partnerships attending

  • Hitrans
  • Nestrans
  • Sestran
  • SWestrans
  • Tactran

Only 12 of the 32 Scottish Councils attended – but, interestingly, all except one (shockingly, Strathclyde) of the 6 mainland Regional Transport Partnerships did attend.  This seems to reinforce the case for giving RTPs back greater resources for assisting cycling development – as used to be the case until scrapped by the SNP when they came to power [Spokes 99, p8 & p1].  Firstly, many local councils are on the small side to have experienced cycling teams, so expertise at regional level could be valuable.  Secondly, councils rightly tend to concentrate their limited cycling resources on the most densely populated areas, but a more strategic input is also needed to ensure cross-boundary routes and linkages – RTPs are well placed to handle this.



Comments are closed.